
Email: legals@bellbuxton.co.uk | Telephone: 0114 249 5969 | Fax: 0114 249 3804
I would like to thank the team at Bell & Buxton for the efficient and helpful way in which you handled the company acquisition on behalf of Carrs. We appreciate the effort that was put in by everyone concerned in order to meet the tight deadline
Mr J Wood
Deputy Managing Director, Carrs of Sheffield
As with any commercial property transaction, the best advice is to seek advice from your solicitor. Just one example of the many issues that can arise relates to ‘break options’, which are arising more frequently in commercial leases. As the recent case of Legal & General Assurance Society Limited v Expeditors International (UK) Limited (2006) demonstrates, it is advisable for both parties to a commercial lease to ensure that the wording of any break clause contained in the lease is not only carefully considered at the point of drafting the lease, but also is re-examined closely when it comes to exercising the break.
In this case, the break clause entitled the tenant to terminate the lease on six months prior written notice provided certain conditions were complied with, which included returning the property to the landlord with vacant possession. This required, amongst other things, the property to be cleared of the tenant’s belongings and personnel. The tenant served a break notice on the landlord and there then followed some discussions about the tenant’s repairing and decorating liability under the lease. Eventually, a deal was struck whereby, in return for a payment, the landlord would release the tenant from all liabilities, past and present, under the lease.
Later, the landlord made a claim against the tenant for arrears of rent and service charges. It argued that the tenant’s exercise of the break option was not effective as the tenant had failed to return the property with vacant possession; the tenant had left a large number of unwanted items inside the property, its staff were still clearing the site after the notice period had expired and it had failed to return the keys to the landlord. The tenant, in turn, argued that a deal had been struck and the landlord could not claim against it.
It is therefore important, for both tenants hoping to implement a break option or for landlords receiving such a notice, to seek timely legal advice as to how best to deal with it.
Bell & Buxton, Solicitors
Telegraph House, High Street, Sheffield, S1 2GA
Authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. Bell & Buxton is the trading name of Bell & Buxton LLP, a limited liability partnership, registered number OC322707, registered in England. A list of members is open to inspection at the above address.
© 2008 - 2013 Bell & Buxton LLP
Website design by DDME